This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 9, 2018. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Objectives
mikejbst edited this page Sep 5, 2013
·
3 revisions
Determine:
- Whether substantial community involvement can be achieved and sustained
- It must be easy for people to be added to a community and/or a project
- It must be easy to contribute to a project (easy to add entries, add example sentences, etc.
- It must be easy to invite others to participate
- Whether the community feedback provided is useful to help enlarge the lexical corpus
- Are people adding lots of words/senses and are they actually legitimately used by the language community.
- Whether involvement creates a sense of ownership
- How many people in the community are beginning to use the results of the lexical work
- Whether broad community feedback results in greater efficiency in creating a lexicon and the resultant dictionary
- Compare to projects that do not use the lexical web app
- To what degree the community is self managing; how much discussion moderation is required/
- What kind/amount of training and training delivery methods are necessary for users to create legitimate lexical elements, example sentences, actionable comments, etc.
- What kinds of questions could we ask reviewers to generate most actionable comments in refining the lexical data.
- Community usage of the dictionary online.
- Whether the lexicographers feel that they have control of their data when users of varying expertise are adding content to the lexicon.
- Whether the review processes are supported well enough in our tools to allow the lexicographer to keep up with resolution of comments and the approval/rejection of new content
- Whether publishing processes appropriately deal with the content state of web added content (under review, approved and rejected)