-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
Change queried values layout. #1293
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## lifted #1293 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.97% 91.95% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 119 119
Lines 14959 14974 +15
Branches 14959 14974 +15
==========================================
+ Hits 13759 13770 +11
- Misses 1110 1114 +4
Partials 90 90 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
16cf3b2 to
4ba0a70
Compare
2fd9f95 to
e5b9911
Compare
4ba0a70 to
86a1033
Compare
e5b9911 to
68fdcc2
Compare
86a1033 to
6e4cd32
Compare
68fdcc2 to
27315a2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 2.
| Benchmark suite | Current: cf74d17 | Previous: 2a2c27f | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
cpu polynomial commitment 2^20 |
3539673391 ns/iter (± 59228169) |
1502751321 ns/iter (± 2911465) |
2.36 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
c9cd915 to
0a59d76
Compare
0a59d76 to
fd7a4d9
Compare
6e4cd32 to
dab9ba4
Compare
fd7a4d9 to
cf74d17
Compare
dab9ba4 to
555c00e
Compare
cf74d17 to
c340d00
Compare
555c00e to
65bbd8b
Compare
c340d00 to
9eb95de
Compare
65bbd8b to
b0822f8
Compare
9eb95de to
e015b6c
Compare
|
Suggestion: // A QM31 column is committed as 4 M31 columns. |
|
Do we need to check that the iterators are empty after the last iteration? Code quote: *col_iter.next() |
ilyalesokhin-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ilyalesokhin-starkware reviewed 4 files and all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 4 of 7 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @leo-starkware).
leo-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@leo-starkware made 1 comment.
Reviewable status: 4 of 7 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @ilyalesokhin-starkware).
crates/stwo/src/core/vcs_lifted/verifier.rs line 133 at r2 (raw file):
Previously, ilyalesokhin-starkware wrote…
Do we need to check that the iterators are empty after the last iteration?
This is checked in crates/stwo/src/core/pcs/quotients.rs:125, but maybe it's indeed better here. WDYT?
e015b6c to
929f0d6
Compare
leo-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@leo-starkware made 2 comments.
Reviewable status: 4 of 7 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @ilyalesokhin-starkware).
crates/stwo/src/core/vcs_lifted/verifier.rs line 133 at r2 (raw file):
Previously, leo-starkware wrote…
This is checked in crates/stwo/src/core/pcs/quotients.rs:125, but maybe it's indeed better here. WDYT?
Added
crates/stwo/src/core/fri.rs line 463 at r2 (raw file):
// The correct type for `decommitmented_values` is `SecureColumnByCoords<CpuBackend>`, // however since this is verifier code, we cannot use types from the prover module.
Done. Also changed the type from vec to array
ilyalesokhin-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ilyalesokhin-starkware reviewed 2 files, made 1 comment, and resolved 2 discussions.
Reviewable status: 6 of 7 files reviewed, all discussions resolved.
leo-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@leo-starkware reviewed 2 files and all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @leo-starkware).
929f0d6 to
a442e4a
Compare

No description provided.