Skip to content

update submodules#133

Merged
yi-xmu merged 1 commit intoeloq-10.6.10from
update_subms
Oct 9, 2025
Merged

update submodules#133
yi-xmu merged 1 commit intoeloq-10.6.10from
update_subms

Conversation

@yi-xmu
Copy link
Collaborator

@yi-xmu yi-xmu commented Oct 9, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal storage components to their latest upstream revisions to keep dependencies current.
    • Refreshes submodule references for improved consistency and build reproducibility.
    • No changes to user-facing behavior, settings, or data; functionality remains the same.
    • This maintenance update prepares the codebase for future enhancements without altering current workflows.
    • No action required from users.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Walkthrough

Updates submodule pointers for storage/eloq components. storage/eloq/store_handler moves from 5903b97286987a6ccbdcce3d00ac2da50f9a3277 to 99503d2c4bae25f1a0949242bb2e41ef2445900d. storage/eloq/tx_service moves from 6952cc57d37cca12b9615e1fab9b05f08310d172 to 055e500c5d947c6fc9b52587c50dbac70f28de39. No code, API, or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change summary
Submodule pointer updates
storage/eloq/store_handler, storage/eloq/tx_service
store_handler: 5903b97 → 99503d2; tx_service: 6952cc5 → 055e500. No source changes; pointers only.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • update submodule #122 — Updates the same storage/eloq submodule refs (tx_service and store_handler).
  • Update submodules #130 — Metadata-only updates to the same submodule pointers in store_handler and tx_service.
  • update subm #117 — Pointer-only updates for storage/eloq/store_handler and storage/eloq/tx_service.

Suggested labels

trigger-ci

Suggested reviewers

  • thweetkomputer
  • liunyl

Poem

I nudge the pins, not lines of lore,
Two little refs now point to more.
Hop, hop—CI will take the tour,
No logic moved, no diff to pore.
A tidy warren, clean and sure—
Submodules set, let builds endure. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title concisely and accurately describes the primary change in this pull request—updating submodules—without extraneous detail, making it clear to reviewers what the PR does.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch update_subms

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79a79e3 and 381be32.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • storage/eloq/store_handler (1 hunks)
  • storage/eloq/tx_service (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
storage/eloq/tx_service (1)

1-1: Submodule pointer looks good.

New commit hash recorded as expected; no issues spotted.

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@yi-xmu yi-xmu requested a review from liunyl October 9, 2025 08:11
@yi-xmu yi-xmu merged commit d0064ee into eloq-10.6.10 Oct 9, 2025
3 checks passed
@yi-xmu yi-xmu deleted the update_subms branch October 9, 2025 08:43
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants