update submodules

[MrGuin]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal infrastructure components (submodules) to newer revisions; no user-facing or functional changes.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Submodule pointers for storage/eloq/store_handler and storage/eloq/tx_service were advanced to new commit hashes; no code or API changes were introduced and no functional logic was altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Submodule pointer updates storage/eloq/store_handler, storage/eloq/tx_service	Updated recorded commits: storage/eloq/store_handler from cd88ee6ec2a4684a8b032b75488319f923d888e7 → 516fe3faaa991212abffb3fd01a5709a4698234d; storage/eloq/tx_service from a3cd3a013b07a9d9be2944aac5b549e7dd334c4e → 03d2d52bf103cee0f87f2bd7157d6b0d69f6f2e8. No functional changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Metadata-only submodule pointer updates; no logic to inspect.

Possibly related PRs

• Update submodules #130 — metadata-only submodule pointer updates touching storage/eloq/store_handler and storage/eloq/tx_service.
• update submodules #133 — updates submodule pointers for the same storage/eloq components.
• update submodule #122 — advances storage/eloq submodule commits overlapping these paths.

Suggested reviewers

• liunyl
• thweetkomputer

Poem

🐰
Hop, hop — new commits land in line,
Tiny pointers shift, no code to pine.
I nibble metadata, tidy and spry,
Leaves unchanged, beneath the sky.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "update submodules" directly and accurately describes the primary change in the changeset. The raw summary indicates that both modified files (storage/eloq/store_handler and storage/eloq/tx_service) only have submodule pointer updates with no functional code changes. The title is concise, specific enough to convey the main purpose of the change, and would allow a teammate scanning history to quickly understand that this is a submodule version update. There is no vagueness, misleading information, or extraneous details.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25db4a6 and abfdbf4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• storage/eloq/store_handler (1 hunks)
• storage/eloq/tx_service (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• storage/eloq/store_handler
• storage/eloq/tx_service

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}