Fix missing backup files when FetchBackup

[githubzilla]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Synchronized an underlying service module to the latest upstream revision. No changes to UI, features, settings, or performance are expected. Public APIs remain unchanged, with no functional differences detected in control flow or error handling. No action is required from users. This keeps dependencies aligned for future compatibility and stability.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated the submodule pointer for storage/eloq/tx_service from commit f06345621308065f8af22c54b85b97bdf794a9b6 to d1cb7add9c8fa7c0068f82aff97c5f6abf892a25. No functional or public API changes indicated.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Submodule pointer update storage/eloq/tx_service	Advanced submodule reference to a new commit; no code changes in this repository’s tracked files.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• update subm #117 — Also updates the storage/eloq/tx_service submodule pointer.
• update submodules #133 — Also updates the storage/eloq/tx_service submodule pointer.

Suggested labels

trigger-ci

Suggested reviewers

• liunyl

Poem

I nudge the pointer, hop and glide,
From hash to hash, a tidy stride.
No code to tweak, no tests to rue—
Just footprints shifting, clean and true.
Thump-thump! says rabbit, ears held high—
Submodules fresh, commits fly by. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	⚠️ Warning	The title claims to fix missing backup files in FetchBackup, but the actual changeset only updates a submodule pointer without any functional or API modifications. This creates a misleading description that does not match the content of the pull request. As a result, the title does not accurately summarize the primary change introduced.	Please update the pull request title to reflect the actual change, for example “Update eloq/tx_service submodule pointer to d1cb7add9c8fa7c0068f82aff97c5f6abf892a25,” or include details of the functional fix if it is contained within the updated submodule commit.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b416fe and e905c16.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• storage/eloq/tx_service (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

storage/eloq/tx_service (1)

1-1: Need clarity on submodule changes.

Only the submodule pointer changed here, so I cannot validate the underlying diff. Please summarize what changed in storage/eloq/tx_service@d1cb7add (or point to release notes/tests) and confirm the backup fix is covered so we can review effectively.

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}