Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @lispandfound, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request implements a critical hotfix by adjusting the unit of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request corrects a unit inconsistency by converting the fault_buffer parameter from meters to kilometers across all configuration versions. The parameter was incorrectly set to 2000.0 (interpreted as kilometers in the code, which would have created an unreasonably large 2000 km buffer) and is now correctly set to 2.0 km.
Changes:
- Updated
fault_bufferfrom 2000.0 to 2.0 across all default parameter configuration files
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| workflow/default_parameters/v24_2_2_4/defaults.yaml | Corrected fault_buffer from 2000.0 to 2.0 km |
| workflow/default_parameters/v24_2_2_2/defaults.yaml | Corrected fault_buffer from 2000.0 to 2.0 km |
| workflow/default_parameters/v24_2_2_1/defaults.yaml | Corrected fault_buffer from 2000.0 to 2.0 km |
| workflow/default_parameters/develop/defaults.yaml | Corrected fault_buffer from 2000.0 to 2.0 km |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a bug where the fault_buffer parameter was specified in meters instead of kilometers across several default configuration files. The change from 2000.0 to 2.0 aligns with the schema definition, which expects the value in km.
While the fix is correct, it highlights a potential maintainability issue due to inconsistent units within the velocity_model configuration block. I've added comments to the changed files suggesting that units be explicitly documented in the configuration to prevent similar bugs in the future. Despite this, the change itself is correct and addresses the immediate issue.
| topo_type: "SQUASHED_TAPERED" | ||
| vs30: 500.0 | ||
| fault_buffer: 2000.0 | ||
| fault_buffer: 2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for fixing the unit for fault_buffer. This highlights a broader maintainability issue with inconsistent units in this configuration block. The schema (schemas.py) and values suggest a mix of units.
For example:
min_vsis in km/s (per schema).fault_bufferis in km (per schema).s_wave_velocityappears to be in m/s, but its schema definition lacks a unit.
This inconsistency can lead to errors. To improve clarity, consider adding comments to specify units for each parameter. A follow-up task to address this would be beneficial.
| vs30: 500.0 | ||
| s_wave_velocity: 3500.0 | ||
| fault_buffer: 2000.0 | ||
| fault_buffer: 2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for fixing the unit for fault_buffer. This highlights a broader maintainability issue with inconsistent units in this configuration block. The schema (schemas.py) and values suggest a mix of units.
For example:
min_vsis in km/s (per schema).fault_bufferis in km (per schema).s_wave_velocityappears to be in m/s, but its schema definition lacks a unit.
This inconsistency can lead to errors. To improve clarity, consider adding comments to specify units for each parameter. A follow-up task to address this would be beneficial.
| topo_type: "SQUASHED_TAPERED" | ||
| vs30: 500.0 | ||
| fault_buffer: 2000.0 | ||
| fault_buffer: 2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for fixing the unit for fault_buffer. This highlights a broader maintainability issue with inconsistent units in this configuration block. The schema (schemas.py) and values suggest a mix of units.
For example:
min_vsis in km/s (per schema).fault_bufferis in km (per schema).s_wave_velocityappears to be in m/s, but its schema definition lacks a unit.
This inconsistency can lead to errors. To improve clarity, consider adding comments to specify units for each parameter. A follow-up task to address this would be beneficial.
| topo_type: "SQUASHED_TAPERED" | ||
| vs30: 500.0 | ||
| fault_buffer: 2000.0 | ||
| fault_buffer: 2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for fixing the unit for fault_buffer. This highlights a broader maintainability issue with inconsistent units in this configuration block. The schema (schemas.py) and values suggest a mix of units.
For example:
min_vsis in km/s (per schema).fault_bufferis in km (per schema).s_wave_velocityappears to be in m/s, but its schema definition lacks a unit.
This inconsistency can lead to errors. To improve clarity, consider adding comments to specify units for each parameter. A follow-up task to address this would be beneficial.
Hotfix for last PR merge, buffer should be in kilometres not metres