Skip to content

Fix topic name mangling when not using ros conventions#177

Merged
sloretz merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
ivanpauno/fix-problem-when-not-using-ros-naming-conventions
May 1, 2020
Merged

Fix topic name mangling when not using ros conventions#177
sloretz merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
ivanpauno/fix-problem-when-not-using-ros-naming-conventions

Conversation

@ivanpauno
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
@ivanpauno ivanpauno requested review from eboasson and sloretz April 30, 2020 20:32
@ivanpauno ivanpauno self-assigned this Apr 30, 2020
@ivanpauno ivanpauno changed the title Fix how topic name should be when not using ros topic name conventions Fix how topic name mangling when not using ros conventions Apr 30, 2020
@ivanpauno ivanpauno changed the title Fix how topic name mangling when not using ros conventions Fix topic name mangling when not using ros conventions Apr 30, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@sloretz sloretz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Skipping the prefix matches rmw_fastrtps and rmw_connext. I haven't figured out what the suffix is for, though Connext doesn't have an option for a suffix so it probably doesn't matter.

@ivanpauno
Copy link
Member Author

Skipping the prefix matches rmw_fastrtps and rmw_connext. I haven't figured out what the suffix is for, though Connext doesn't have an option for a suffix so it probably doesn't matter.

The suffix is added to services Request and Reply topics.

@sloretz
Copy link
Contributor

sloretz commented May 1, 2020

CI ok in ros2/system_tests#428 (comment) ; merging ahead of nightlies

@sloretz sloretz merged commit 40ba599 into master May 1, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the ivanpauno/fix-problem-when-not-using-ros-naming-conventions branch May 1, 2020 01:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants