-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
Reconsider use of never-stable, add techpreview variant #259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
/hold Hold for now, I want to make sure no one else is finding never-stable useful |
|
I asked on slack and got no opinions about never-stable, so I think it's better to use it more sparingly. /hold cancel |
2891a0f to
cbc3c90
Compare
- I haven't found being more liberal with adding jobs to the never-stable list to be particularly helpful, especially with so many failing. I think each should be investigated, and a bug filed -- and then added to the never-stable list. - Adds a new techpreview variant, for TPNU jobs
|
Ok this should be ready now |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, stbenjam The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
I haven't found being more liberal with adding jobs to the never-stable
list to be particularly helpful, especially with so many failing. I
think each should be investigated, and a bug filed -- and then added to
the never-stable list.
Exclude never-stable jobs from home page widgets
Adds a new techpreview variant, for TPNU jobs (being added in [OCPCLOUD-1201] Add periodics for TechPreviewNoUpgrade clusters release#19845)