Skip to content

Conversation

@jankapunkt
Copy link
Collaborator

@jankapunkt jankapunkt commented Dec 12, 2025

This is ongoing work on an extensive architecture overview, see #482

@jankapunkt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@copilot summarize the architecture from a high level overview and describe the interplay between the several packages and their roles. Focus on the purpose of these inter relation and make clear in which stage (build vs. runtime) the specific packages act and interact.

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Dec 12, 2025

@jankapunkt I've opened a new pull request, #484, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.

…build/runtime stages

Co-authored-by: jankapunkt <1135285+jankapunkt@users.noreply.github.com>
@jankapunkt jankapunkt changed the title docs: prepare improvement of arch overview docs: improvement of architecture documentation Dec 12, 2025
Copilot AI and others added 2 commits December 12, 2025 10:00
…Instance, and View

Co-authored-by: jankapunkt <1135285+jankapunkt@users.noreply.github.com>
…eferences View

Co-authored-by: jankapunkt <1135285+jankapunkt@users.noreply.github.com>
@jankapunkt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think we have a CI issue, this PR is not touching any code...

docs: add comprehensive architecture overview with build/runtime stages, package roles, and key terms
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Dec 12, 2025

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
2 out of 3 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ jankapunkt
✅ nachocodoner
❌ Copilot
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@jankapunkt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@copilot can you sign the CLA?

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Dec 12, 2025

@jankapunkt I've opened a new pull request, #485, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.

@jankapunkt jankapunkt linked an issue Dec 15, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@jankapunkt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We can continue with this, once #486 is merged

@jankapunkt jankapunkt added this to the 3.1 milestone Dec 17, 2025
@jankapunkt jankapunkt marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2025 17:37
@radekmie
Copy link
Collaborator

I read through the rendered version, and with my rather limited Blaze knowledge, I find it really helpful. I'm just thinking whether it'd make sense to move the summary to the top, as it's a good mental model for Blaze. Besides that, I'd merge it as-is, since it's much better than the current overview, plus it can be iterated over.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Architecture Overview is still insufficient

5 participants