Skip to content

Chore/Add RC failure options for mttr-2.2.1#264

Merged
adriennet823 merged 13 commits intosidebranch/mttr-2.2.1-base-for-RC-failure-changesfrom
chore/add-mttr-2.2.1-rc-failure-changes
Sep 15, 2025
Merged

Chore/Add RC failure options for mttr-2.2.1#264
adriennet823 merged 13 commits intosidebranch/mttr-2.2.1-base-for-RC-failure-changesfrom
chore/add-mttr-2.2.1-rc-failure-changes

Conversation

@adriennet823
Copy link
Contributor

@adriennet823 adriennet823 commented Sep 15, 2025

Provides RC failure options, specified by ArduPilot parameters, to simulate sensor failures via software.

Same changes that were added for mttr-2.2.0 failure options: #260

Initial list of commits that were cherry-picked can be found here.

Not a Production release! After merge, a release can be made off sidebranch/mttr-2.2.1-base-for-RC-failure-changes for mttr-2.2.1/MATE v10.6.0 Likely Failures testing

Comment on lines +30 to +33
IRLock *irlock()
{
return IRLock::get_singleton();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be indented?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved offline: formatting will be disregarded in this branch, since changes have been cherry-picked and do not intend to be merged into master nor used in production flight

Copy link
Contributor

@rabad-matternet rabad-matternet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Please see the question I have

@adriennet823 adriennet823 merged commit 891492f into sidebranch/mttr-2.2.1-base-for-RC-failure-changes Sep 15, 2025
4 checks passed
@adriennet823 adriennet823 deleted the chore/add-mttr-2.2.1-rc-failure-changes branch September 15, 2025 21:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants