[yugabyte] Working AWS implementation#1191
Merged
barroco merged 1 commit intointeruss:masterfrom Jun 17, 2025
Merged
Conversation
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
the-glu
force-pushed
the
yugabyte_in_aws
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0942ba5 to
aa677ef
Compare
the-glu
force-pushed
the
yugabyte_in_aws
branch
2 times, most recently
from
db45bf1 to
6b13645
Compare
barroco
reviewed
Jun 17, 2025
deploy/infrastructure/dependencies/terraform-aws-kubernetes/network_lb.tf
Show resolved
Hide resolved
the-glu
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
Redeployed and confirmed working in aws |
barroco
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2025
8 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR does follows #1190
It improve terraform files on the aws side to support yugabyte.
It's mostly similar from the previous PR, with the following changes:
The same limitation applies (e.g. limited documentation ;) )
It has been validated with an aws cluster and a aws-gcp cluster: