Skip to content

Conversation

@Strflightmight09
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Strflightmight09 Strflightmight09 self-assigned this Feb 1, 2026
@Strflightmight09 Strflightmight09 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 1, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 1, 2026

Walkthrough

OperatorConstants.java adds a new private constant DOUBLE_TAP_TIMEOUT_SECONDS = 0.5. Four trigger initializers are changed to require a double-press within that timeout: RESET_HEADING_TRIGGER (y()), OPEN_CLIMBER_TRIGGER (back() or c()), ENABLE_INTAKE_ASSIST_TRIGGER (o()), and DISABLE_INTAKE_ASSIST_TRIGGER (p()), each now using .multiPress(2, DOUBLE_TAP_TIMEOUT_SECONDS).

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess whether the intended changes are documented. Add a description explaining why multi-press requirements were added to these specific triggers and any behavioral implications.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Better Controls' is vague and does not convey specific information about the changes, such as adding multi-press behaviors or the specific triggers modified. Use a more descriptive title like 'Add multi-press requirements to trigger controls' to clearly indicate the main change.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants