Nixcon sponsor process tuning #141
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It doesn't matter how organisers are informed of provisionally approved sponsors, as long they can issue objections to the SC.
ners
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
winterqt
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
ForsakenHarmony
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
roberth
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
Nebucatnetzer
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
tomberek
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
john-rodewald
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
Gabriella439
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It doesn't matter how organisers are informed of provisionally approved sponsors, as long they can issue objections to the SC, this PR updates the process to reflect that.
Should get a couple SC and organiser approvals, but imo doesn't need a full SC majority approval because it's not a significant deviation.