-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Feb2020
- Jhan & Danny to update us on JaC progress
- UKMO Ticket 940 submitted for JULES-5.7. This "completes" changes needed for CABLE "front end"
- HAC working with 5.6 on Gadi. Verified against 5.5 on raijin. CABLE-CABLE equivalent to CABLE-JULES @ Loobos.
- CABLE mostly waiting on separation of Land/Sea surface fluxes *. JULES-5.8 release "may" include CABLE anyway *. JULES closed release to follow that
- Meeting with JULES/UKMO/UMST Feb 4th
-
Gab & Martin to update us on Benchmarking progress
-
Proposed closed release - establishment of release cycle
-
Increased CABLE presence in 2020
#234
Logged revisions on trunk since last meeting.
Build script changes for Gadi.
STILL Carrying
#222 - Climate from zero - ??check with Ian why it was an issue?? Emailed Ian 30/1/20 to gauge his objection status.
#223 - nparams in mpicommon do not match ?revisit - Martin
#200 - 4d vars - this is an issue as it is not ALMA compliant -? Gab -Feb
#199 - Tiled vegetation cannot be passed through met file [Fix (Anna says hack - works for site runs) provided, not implemented] -
- recent experience with JAC - #226 'Needs to be tested'
#225 - improved remove_trans logic diappeared - Martin?
#237 - labile spinup flag (MDK)
#238 - spincasainput doesn't do anything...
Proposed Closed Release
#224 - Implement JAC structure
- Bitwise Comparable - see Ticket
#226 - Within JAC structure re-write files
- Bitwise Comparable - see Ticket
- Next Stepping stone towards syncing CABLE trunk with HAC/JAC
Gather for closed release:
#227 - IF loop bug trapped by Martin
#228 - CNP fixes - unphysical trapping NOT in trunk?
Preferable for closed release:
#230 - Establish Consistent treatment of Radiation "bands". vis/NIR, beam/diffuse - AT ToDO implementation stage''
A list of tickets that I (Martin) suggests we close...
#33 - I have embedded this functionality for offline runs in https://github.com/mdekauwe/CABLE_scripts and no one has proposed a solution in 6 years...
#22 - presumably we don't need a ticket for this, it is either being done or forgotten about
#34 - a structure revision is happening as part of JAC, we don't need this.
#37 - 6 years old, if no one is going to do this...then we don't need a ticket.
#38 - given the manual was converted to HTML, shouldn't this now be closed?
#55 - what is the status of this float/double thing?
#58 - isn't this also happening as part of JAC, I think we can close this.
#64 - close, there is no description of what it is
#71 - init...5 years old, what is the status here?
#74 - who is this actually a problem for, who is ever going to fix this...?
#75 - this can be closed ... we need to simply obey the MO moving forward
#76- this is a big cable issue...but again unless we fix this, I'm not sure what this ticket offers.
#78 - presumably no one is going to do this, so close
#81 - is this relevant still and if so, how?
#82 - is this still relevant? [RML: brought ticket up to date. Fixed in ACCESS-ESM1.5/CABLE2.4 but changes may need to be brought into trunk]
#83 - is this different from #55?
#88 - what is the status of the LUC work? This ticket doesn't really say anything?
#89 - was this fixed? It is unclear to me
#92 - also not clear on what the status of this is?
#96 - what is the status of this?
#104 - what is the status of this?
#105 - was this fixed then, the ticket implies it was?
#114 - close, this simply is an aspiration to do something