[WIP]: Alternate pprint for values #28
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As discussed in zestyping#21 I've made some changes to the pprint change proposed there. * This will save long values into a separate file. * This makes pprint of the variable the default. I think this is a good idea because it will handle things like dicts nested within lists and other builtin types.
Collaborator
Author
|
@abadger - If you have time, can you talk a look at this pull request? As mentioned I'd like to add some tests before I merge this functionality though. |
|
+1 because of the pprint. more complex or nested objects getting truncated is quite a pain. |
Collaborator
Author
|
@Schabernack - If you could write a test or two for this, I'll merge and do a release? |
zestyping
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
56ddf51 to
d9f393c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request is currently a WIP - it needs tests before it can be merged!
As discussed in #21 I've made some changes
to the pprint change proposed there.
because it will handle things like dicts nested within lists and other
builtin types.