Skip to content

Conversation

@sic2
Copy link

@sic2 sic2 commented Jul 14, 2016

I am not sure encourage the flow of ideas makes sense on its own.

Also, the last paragraph does not flow so well IMO.

About:

open licenses [GPL and GPL-compatible, BSD, MIT, Apache, Mozilla, Eclipse, DTFYW].

Do you actually mean open: (e.g. GPL and GPL-compatible, etc)

Or you are restricted only to those ones?

I am not sure `encourage the flow of ideas` makes sense on its own. 

Also, the last paragraph does not flow so well IMO.

About:
> open licenses [GPL and GPL-compatible, BSD, MIT, Apache, Mozilla, Eclipse, DTFYW].  

Do you actually mean open: ` (e.g. GPL and GPL-compatible, etc) `

Or you are restricted only to those ones?
@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
`Zencoders` is a group of software developers and informatics enthusiasts
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I started from 2014 italian description. Probably it would be better to merge the first two phrases like that:

Zencoders is a group of software developers and informatics enthusiasts leveraging knowledge sharing amongst its members to realize common projects and develop innovating ideas.

@sic2
Copy link
Author

sic2 commented Jul 14, 2016

@deepskyblue86 I tried to follow your suggestions.
The very last bit, about the group joining policy, was not easy. Hope it makes sense

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants