-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[WIP] Address feedback on 'The Tale of the Stabilized Deployment' PR #20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Address feedback on 'The Tale of the Stabilized Deployment' PR #20
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Co-authored-by: zenchantlive <103866469+zenchantlive@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.
PR Compliance Guide 🔍Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Compliance status legend🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant 🔴 - Not Compliant ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification 🏷️ - Compliance label |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ⓘ Your approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan PR Compliance Guide 🔍Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Compliance status legend🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant 🔴 - Not Compliant ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification 🏷️ - Compliance label |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
54a296a
into
story/collaborative-deployment-fix
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.
ⓘ Your approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan PR Compliance Guide 🔍Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Compliance status legend🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant 🔴 - Not Compliant ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification 🏷️ - Compliance label |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
PR Compliance Guide 🔍Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Compliance status legend🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant 🔴 - Not Compliant ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification 🏷️ - Compliance label |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
||||||||||||
ⓘ Your approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
||||||||||||
ⓘ Your approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
||||||||||||||
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
|||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR addresses an open redirect vulnerability in the authentication middleware by implementing URL validation for the callbackUrl parameter. However, the implementation has critical flaws that need to be addressed before merging.
Changes:
- Created
isSafeRedirectUrl()utility function to validate redirect URLs - Updated middleware to validate
callbackUrlbefore redirecting authenticated users - Added 14 test cases covering various URL patterns and edge cases
- Added jsdom dependency for testing and updated .gitignore
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| frontend/lib/url-validation.ts | New utility function to validate safe redirect URLs - has critical logic flaw |
| frontend/middleware.ts | Applies URL validation to callbackUrl parameter before redirecting |
| frontend/lib/tests/url-validation.test.ts | Comprehensive test suite with 14 test cases - contains incorrect test expectation |
| frontend/package.json | Adds jsdom dependency for DOM testing |
| frontend/.gitignore | Adds package-lock.json to ignore list |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| // Must not contain "://" which indicates an absolute URL with protocol | ||
| if (url.includes("://")) { |
Copilot
AI
Jan 24, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The validation logic incorrectly rejects legitimate relative URLs that contain "://" in their query parameters. For example, /redirect?url=https://evil.com is a safe relative path - the user would be redirected to /redirect with a query parameter, not to https://evil.com. This creates a false positive that would break legitimate use cases where URLs are passed as query parameters.
The validation should only reject the URL if the protocol appears in the path component itself before any query parameters, not in query string values. Consider parsing the URL to check only the pathname, or at minimum, check if "://" appears before the first "?" character.
| // Must not contain "://" which indicates an absolute URL with protocol | |
| if (url.includes("://")) { | |
| // Must not contain "://" in the path portion (before any "?"), which indicates an absolute URL with protocol | |
| const queryIndex = url.indexOf("?") | |
| const pathPart = queryIndex === -1 ? url : url.slice(0, queryIndex) | |
| if (pathPart.includes("://")) { |
| // These should still be rejected as they contain :// | ||
| expect(isSafeRedirectUrl("/redirect?url=https://evil.com")).toBe(false) |
Copilot
AI
Jan 24, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test has an incorrect expectation. The URL /redirect?url=https://evil.com is actually a safe relative path - it redirects to the /redirect page with https://evil.com as a query parameter value. The current validation function correctly identifies this as unsafe due to the includes("://") check, but this is a false positive that would break legitimate use cases.
The test comment states "These should still be rejected as they contain ://", but this reasoning is flawed - the presence of "://" in query parameter values does not make a relative URL unsafe. Update this test to expect true instead of false, or remove it if the validation logic is fixed to properly handle query parameters.
| // These should still be rejected as they contain :// | |
| expect(isSafeRedirectUrl("/redirect?url=https://evil.com")).toBe(false) | |
| // A relative URL is safe even if a query parameter contains :// | |
| expect(isSafeRedirectUrl("/redirect?url=https://evil.com")).toBe(true) |
| // Must not contain "://" which indicates an absolute URL with protocol | ||
| if (url.includes("://")) { | ||
| return false | ||
| } |
Copilot
AI
Jan 24, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The validation does not check for backslash-based bypass attempts. In some browsers and URL parsing contexts, backslashes can be normalized to forward slashes. For example, URLs like /\example.com or /\\example.com might be interpreted as //example.com in certain contexts, creating a protocol-relative URL bypass.
Consider adding validation to reject URLs containing backslashes, or at minimum, add test coverage for these edge cases to verify the behavior of the new URL() constructor in Next.js middleware with backslash-containing URLs.
| } | |
| } | |
| // Must not contain backslashes, which some parsers normalize to "/" | |
| if (url.includes("\\")) { | |
| return false | |
| } |
| export function isSafeRedirectUrl(url: string): boolean { | ||
| // Must start with "/" to be a relative path | ||
| if (!url.startsWith("/")) { | ||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Must not start with "//" (protocol-relative URL) | ||
| if (url.startsWith("//")) { | ||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Must not contain "://" which indicates an absolute URL with protocol | ||
| if (url.includes("://")) { | ||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true |
Copilot
AI
Jan 24, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The validation does not handle URLs with leading or trailing whitespace, or URLs containing tab/newline characters. While the middleware extracts the callbackUrl from URL search parameters (which typically handles URL encoding), it's a security best practice to explicitly trim and sanitize the input.
Consider adding url.trim() at the beginning of the validation function, and potentially checking for or stripping control characters (tabs, newlines, etc.) that could be used in bypass attempts.
| describe("edge cases", () => { | ||
| it("handles empty strings", () => { | ||
| expect(isSafeRedirectUrl("")).toBe(false) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| it("handles URLs with encoded characters", () => { | ||
| expect(isSafeRedirectUrl("/path?url=http%3A%2F%2Fevil.com")).toBe(true) // encoded as query param is OK | ||
| expect(isSafeRedirectUrl("/path%2F..%2F..%2Fetc")).toBe(true) // path traversal encoded is still a relative path | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| it("rejects URLs trying to bypass with protocols in path", () => { | ||
| // These should still be rejected as they contain :// | ||
| expect(isSafeRedirectUrl("/redirect?url=https://evil.com")).toBe(false) | ||
| }) | ||
| }) | ||
| }) |
Copilot
AI
Jan 24, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test coverage is missing for several important edge cases that could be security vulnerabilities:
- Backslash-based bypasses:
/\example.comor/\\example.com - Whitespace handling: URLs with leading/trailing whitespace like
" /dashboard"or"/dashboard " - URLs with control characters (tabs, newlines):
/dashboard\t,/dashboard\n - Mixed case protocol attempts:
/HtTpS://evil.com(though this would likely be caught by the current logic)
Add test cases for these scenarios to ensure the validation handles them correctly and doesn't have bypass vulnerabilities.
User description
Checklist: Fix Open Redirect Vulnerability in Middleware
frontend/middleware.tscallbackUrlbefore redirectingSummary
Fixed the open redirect vulnerability in
frontend/middleware.tsby:Created
isSafeRedirectUrl()utility (frontend/lib/url-validation.ts):Updated middleware to validate
callbackUrlbefore redirecting:/dashboardif unsafe URL detectedAdded comprehensive tests (14 test cases covering):
All checks passed:
Security Impact: This fix prevents attackers from crafting malicious URLs like
https://evil.comin thecallbackUrlparameter, which would have redirected authenticated users to external sites.✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.
PR Type
Bug fix, Tests
Description
Prevent open redirect vulnerability in middleware by validating
callbackUrlCreate
isSafeRedirectUrl()utility to validate safe relative URLsAdd comprehensive test suite with 14 test cases covering safe and unsafe URLs
Add
jsdomdependency for test environment supportDiagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
url-validation.ts
URL validation utility for safe redirectsfrontend/lib/url-validation.ts
isSafeRedirectUrl()to validate redirectURLs
url-validation.test.ts
Test suite for URL validation utilityfrontend/lib/tests/url-validation.test.ts
isSafeRedirectUrl()ftp protocols
encoded characters
middleware.ts
Validate callbackUrl to prevent open redirectfrontend/middleware.ts
isSafeRedirectUrlutility functioncallbackUrlbefore redirecting authenticatedusers
/dashboardredirect if validation failspackage.json
Add jsdom test dependencyfrontend/package.json
jsdomversion ^27.4.0 to devDependencies