Skip to content

[Dependency] Bump sqlalchemy from 1.4.29 to 2.0.9 in /.setup/pip#912

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dependabot/pip/dot-setup/pip/sqlalchemy-2.0.9
Closed

[Dependency] Bump sqlalchemy from 1.4.29 to 2.0.9 in /.setup/pip#912
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dependabot/pip/dot-setup/pip/sqlalchemy-2.0.9

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Apr 10, 2023

Bumps sqlalchemy from 1.4.29 to 2.0.9.

Release notes

Sourced from sqlalchemy's releases.

2.0.9

Released: April 5, 2023

orm

  • [orm] [bug] Fixed endless loop which could occur when using "relationship to aliased class" feature and also indicating a recursive eager loader such as lazy="selectinload" in the loader, in combination with another eager loader on the opposite side. The check for cycles has been fixed to include aliased class relationships.

    This change is also backported to: 1.4.48

    References: #9590

mariadb

  • [mariadb] [bug] Added row_number as reserved word in MariaDb.

    References: #9588

mssql

  • [mssql] [bug] Due to a critical bug identified in SQL Server, the SQLAlchemy "insertmanyvalues" feature which allows fast INSERT of many rows while also supporting RETURNING unfortunately needs to be disabled for SQL Server. SQL Server is apparently unable to guarantee that the order of rows inserted matches the order in which they are sent back by OUTPUT inserted when table-valued rows are used with INSERT in conjunction with OUTPUT inserted. We are trying to see if Microsoft is able to confirm this undocumented behavior however there is no known workaround, other than it's not safe to use table-valued expressions with OUTPUT inserted for now.

    References: #9603

  • [mssql] [bug] Changed the bulk INSERT strategy used for SQL Server "executemany" with pyodbc when fast_executemany is set to True by using fast_executemany / cursor.executemany() for bulk INSERT that does not include RETURNING, restoring the same behavior as was used in SQLAlchemy 1.4 when this parameter is set.

    New performance details from end users have shown that fast_executemany is still much faster for very large datasets as it uses ODBC commands that can receive all rows in a single round trip, allowing for much larger datasizes than the batches that can be sent by "insertmanyvalues" as was implemented for SQL Server.

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Apr 10, 2023

The following labels could not be found: dependencies.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #912 (0d80e1b) into master (00d119c) will decrease coverage by 2.48%.
The diff coverage is 3.22%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #912      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     23.32%   20.85%   -2.48%     
- Complexity     7818     7826       +8     
============================================
  Files           220      194      -26     
  Lines         27303    24583    -2720     
  Branches         70       70              
============================================
- Hits           6369     5127    -1242     
+ Misses        20866    19388    -1478     
  Partials         68       68              
Flag Coverage Δ
autograder ?
js 28.47% <ø> (ø)
migrator ?
php 20.19% <3.22%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
python_submitty_utils 71.65% <ø> (ø)
submitty_daemon_jobs ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Bumps [sqlalchemy](https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy) from 1.4.29 to 2.0.9.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/blob/main/CHANGES.rst)
- [Commits](https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/commits)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: sqlalchemy
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/pip/dot-setup/pip/sqlalchemy-2.0.9 branch from efcd04a to 0d80e1b Compare April 19, 2023 23:49
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Apr 24, 2023

Superseded by #935.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Apr 24, 2023
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/pip/dot-setup/pip/sqlalchemy-2.0.9 branch April 24, 2023 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant