Skip to content

Skip CI/deploy for docs-only changes#61

Merged
windoze95 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
ci/skip-non-code-changes
Mar 8, 2026
Merged

Skip CI/deploy for docs-only changes#61
windoze95 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
ci/skip-non-code-changes

Conversation

@windoze95
Copy link
Owner

@windoze95 windoze95 commented Mar 8, 2026

Summary

  • Adds paths-ignore to both CI and deploy workflows
  • Skipped paths: *.md, docs/**, LICENSE, .gitignore
  • workflow_dispatch still allows manual deploys regardless of paths

Test plan

  • Merge the README/license PR first — verify CI does not trigger on this PR
  • Verify a code-change PR still triggers CI normally

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Adds paths-ignore for *.md, docs/**, LICENSE, and .gitignore
to both CI and deploy workflows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3e5cf33270

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

paths-ignore on a required status check causes docs-only PRs to stay
pending indefinitely because GitHub treats the skipped workflow as
never reported rather than passed. Deploy workflow keeps its
paths-ignore since it is not a required PR check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@windoze95 windoze95 merged commit 2690f7e into main Mar 8, 2026
1 check passed
@windoze95 windoze95 deleted the ci/skip-non-code-changes branch March 8, 2026 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant