Allow parameters in intelligent search url #112
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @Robi9, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request modifies the regular expression used to validate the URL for the intelligent search API in the send_msg_catalog.go file. The goal is to allow parameters in the intelligent search URL, which were previously not permitted by the regex.
Highlights
- Regex Update: The regular expression for matching intelligent search URLs has been updated to allow for query parameters.
- Feature Enhancement: This change enables the use of parameters in intelligent search URLs, enhancing the functionality of the search API.
Changelog
- flows/actions/send_msg_catalog.go
- Modified the regex
regexIntelligentto allow query parameters in the intelligent search URL. - The regex now matches URLs with optional query parameters, such as
?param1=value1¶m2=value2.
- Modified the regex
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Did you know?
Regular expressions are used in many programming languages and tools, including Python, JavaScript, Perl, and grep.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request modifies a regular expression to allow parameters in an intelligent search URL. The change seems straightforward and addresses the stated goal. However, I have a few observations regarding the regex and its potential impact.
Summary of Findings
- Regex Complexity and Performance: The modified regex, while functional, could potentially become a performance bottleneck if the number of parameters in the URL increases significantly. It might be worthwhile to explore alternative regex patterns or other parsing methods if performance becomes an issue.
- Regex Robustness: The regex might not cover all possible variations of URL parameters. Consider adding more test cases to ensure it handles different parameter formats and edge cases correctly.
Merge Readiness
The pull request introduces a change to a regular expression. While the change appears to address the stated goal, there are potential concerns regarding regex complexity and robustness. I recommend addressing the medium severity comment before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.
No description provided.