Add mac80211_hwsim for wifi testing to installer image #1494
+6
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 18337545893Details
💛 - Coveralls |
jstodola
reviewed
Oct 6, 2025
Contributor
|
@rvykydal is this just for rawhide or is it also needed for f43? |
Contributor
Author
No, this would go only to rawhide. |
Resolves: INSTALLER-4402
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
add-driver-for-wifi-testing-to-image
branch
from
5acd8dd to
eaa5348
Compare
bcl
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves: INSTALLER-4402
We need the kernel module in the installer image to support wireless configuration testing.
It is not possible to use
removekmodas is because it supports only modules inkernelsubdirectory while this patch is dealing withinternalsubdirectory. I tried to extend the functionality of the command but it is not really easy, seems to me it would require parameterization or new command (to keep backwards compatibility) which, if at all should be discussed with @bcl.