Skip to content

Conversation

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

to "tableSchema": {...}, which is more appropriate given that tableSchema is single-valued.

Fixes #855.

…which is more appropriate given that tableSchema is single-valued.

Fixes #855.
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Aug 20, 2017

@gkellogg @danbri @JeniT : this PR changes some of the normative documents' local drafts. I am not sure this is something we should execute. The issue should be marked as 'Erratum', put a link to this PR, and leave it open. For the time being, that is what I did.

(same for the #856)

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Aug 20, 2017

#855 is marked as valid erratum, this PR is left open until revision of the normative documents.

@gkellogg gkellogg added the Errata label Nov 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Examples 41-48 suggest tableSchema can have array content

3 participants