-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
FEAT: improve coverage for pkg/workloadmanager to 34% from 16% #163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
FEAT: improve coverage for pkg/workloadmanager to 34% from 16% #163
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Sagar Choudhary <sagar6203620715@gmail.com>
Summary of ChangesHello @Sagar-6203620715, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly boosts the unit test coverage for the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request significantly improves test coverage for the pkg/workloadmanager package by adding new test files for authentication, client caching, CodeInterpreter controller logic, and sandbox helpers. The new tests cover various scenarios, including authentication flows, JWT parsing, cache behaviors (LRU, eviction, expiration), and Kubernetes resource conversions. This is a valuable contribution to the project's stability and maintainability.
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #163 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 42.29%
=======================================
Files ? 29
Lines ? 2549
Branches ? 0
=======================================
Hits ? 1078
Misses ? 1339
Partials ? 132
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Signed-off-by: Sagar Choudhary <sagar6203620715@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagar Choudhary <sagar6203620715@gmail.com>
|
/cc @hzxuzhonghu |
f0f1524 to
5527a9f
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
hzxuzhonghu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No big issue, please read https://go.dev/wiki/TableDrivenTests#
Signed-off-by: Sagar Choudhary <sagar6203620715@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagar Choudhary <sagar6203620715@gmail.com>
|
@hzxuzhonghu I have refactored and reviewed the code and removed unrequired redundant tests Ready for final review->merge |
|
HI @hzxuzhonghu Apologies to ping you but I would like to request you to review this pull request as I have merged the two functions as you instructed and refactored the code. |
hzxuzhonghu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the big coverage bump! The tests are useful overall, but please refactor several groups to follow Go table-driven style and reduce a flaky sleep. Details:
Table-driven refactors requested
pkg/workloadmanager/client_cache_test.go: consolidateTestParseJWTExpiry_*cases into one table test (valid/invalid/no-exp/float/int). Also consider table-driven grouping for cache eviction/update/remove variants.pkg/workloadmanager/codeinterpreter_controller_test.go: combine RuntimeClassName and AuthMode variants into table-driven cases.pkg/workloadmanager/sandbox_helper_test.go: combinebuildSandboxInfovariants into a table-driven test.pkg/workloadmanager/auth_test.go: merge the two cache-hit tests into a small table.
Stability note
TestTokenCache_Get_Expiredcurrently sleeps 2s. Please reduce to a short TTL (e.g., 50–100ms) and a small sleep to avoid slow/flaky tests.
Once these are addressed, the test suite looks good to me.
Signed-off-by: Sagar Choudhary <sagar6203620715@gmail.com>
Description
Added test files, coverage extended to 34%
Related Issue
Partially fixes #88
Type of Change
Changes Made
Added test for two files in pkg/router
Testing
Before

After
