Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 9, 2026

Coding agent has begun work on Fixing “SDK location not found” to build Blanket for Android APK and will update this pull request as work progresses.

Original prompt
  • What went wrong: Could not determine the dependencies of task ':app:compileDebugJavaWithJavac'. > SDK location not found. Define a valid SDK location with an ANDROID_HOME environment variable or by setting the sdk.dir path in your project's local properties file at '/root/blanketforandroid/local.properties'.

TITLE: Fixing “SDK location not found” to build Blanket for Android APK

USER INTENT:
Build the “Blanket for Android” APK and resolve Gradle build failures caused by Android SDK path configuration errors.

TASK DESCRIPTION:

  • User is trying to build an Android APK for the Blanket Android project (“blanketforandroid”).
  • Build fails during Gradle tasks (lint and Java compile) because the Android SDK location is not configured.
  • Need to define the Android SDK path either via:
    • ANDROID_HOME environment variable, and/or
    • sdk.dir in the project’s local.properties file (explicitly referenced at /root/blanketforandroid/local.properties).
  • Errors observed during build:
    • :app:lintVitalReportInternal dependency resolution fails due to missing SDK location.
    • :app:compileDebugJavaWithJavac fails for the same reason.

EXISTING:

  • The issue has been identified as an Android SDK configuration problem (no valid SDK location).
  • The project path and expected config target are known:
    • /root/blanketforandroid/local.properties should contain sdk.dir=... if environment variables aren’t set.
  • No code changes were made; only build errors were reported.

PENDING:

  • Install or confirm availability of the Android SDK on the system/container used for building.
  • Set SDK location using one of the required methods:
    1. Export ANDROID_HOME (and likely update PATH to include platform-tools), or
    2. Create/edit /root/blanketforandroid/local.properties to include sdk.dir=/path/to/Android/Sdk (or equivalent location).
  • Re-run the Gradle build to generate the APK once SDK resolution succeeds.

CODE STATE:
Files discussed:

  • /root/blanketforandroid/local.properties (referenced by Gradle error; not shown/edited in conversation)

No code snippets or diffs were provided; no repository files were changed in the conversation.

RELEVANT CODE/DOCUMENTATION SNIPPETS:
Gradle error messages captured from the build output:

  • “Could not determine the dependencies of task ':app:lintVitalReportInternal'. > SDK location not found. Define a valid SDK location with an ANDROID_HOME environment variable”
  • “Could not determine the dependencies of task ':app:compileDebugJavaWithJavac'. > SDK location not found. Define a valid SDK location with an ANDROID_HOME environment variable or by setting the sdk.dir path in your project's local properties file at '/root/blanketforandroid/local.properties'.”

OTHER NOTES:

  • The assistant’s earlier response (“Your work will be continued in this pull request:”) did not address the build issue and provided no actionable steps; the key actionable next step is configuring the Android SDK path correctly so Gradle can run lint/compile tasks and produce the APK.

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

@vinberg88 vinberg88 marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2026 04:49
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 9, 2026 04:49
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

@vinberg88 vinberg88 merged commit 7eccb94 into main Jan 9, 2026
1 of 4 checks passed
Copilot AI requested a review from vinberg88 January 9, 2026 04:49
Copilot stopped work on behalf of vinberg88 due to an error January 9, 2026 04:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants