Skip to content

Better coverage for property tests #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
luisggpina wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Better coverage for property tests #2

luisggpina wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@luisggpina
Copy link

@luisggpina luisggpina commented May 23, 2024

This change improves the coverage of some property tests by improving the generator:

  • The generator of examplevos objects now picks a type of equatability at random
  • The property tests now cover all implementations of method areEquatable in the enum AbstractValueObject.Equatability
  • The property tests now cover method canEqual in class AbstractValueObject
  • The property tests now cover method equalityCriteria in class Indexed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@luisggpina