Skip to content

Conversation

@martinfleis
Copy link
Contributor

an attempt to fix the CI

@martinfleis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jGaboardi a question here is whether we need the CRON job at all. This tracks the version of the env used for the paper and should not change since we have a lock file in place. So maybe not needed to keep it around?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.89%. Comparing base (c1c205e) to head (7e88932).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #283   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.89%   75.89%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         278      278           
=======================================
  Hits          211      211           
  Misses         67       67           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jGaboardi
Copy link
Collaborator

Sure -- let's drop the CRON job

@martinfleis martinfleis merged commit bc6ed71 into main Sep 23, 2025
4 checks passed
@martinfleis martinfleis deleted the macos-fail branch September 23, 2025 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants