Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
105 changes: 87 additions & 18 deletions drafts/te-types-update/diffs/te-pkt-types/model-diff-spaces.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,46 +1,63 @@
11c11,12
11c11
< "RFC 8776: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering";
---
> "RFCXXXX: Updated Common YANG Data Types for Traffic
> Engineering";
12a14,15
> "RFCXXXX: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering";
12a13,14
> // RFC Editor: replace XXXX with actual RFC number
> // and remove this note
22c25
22c24
< <mailto:tsaad@juniper.net>
---
> <mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>
41c44
37,39c39,49
< data type definitions specific to MPLS TE. The model fully
< conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture
< (NMDA).
---
> data type definitions specific to Packet Traffic Enginnering
> (TE).
>
> The model fully conforms to the Network Management Datastore
> Architecture (NMDA).
>
> The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
> NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED',
> 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as
> described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when,
> they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
41c51
< Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
---
> Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
46c49
> Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
46c56
< the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
---
> the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
51,52c54,71
51,52c61,80
< This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8776; see the
< RFC itself for full legal notices.";
---
> This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself
> for full legal notices.";
>
> revision 2023-07-10 {
> revision 2024-01-25 {
> description
> "Added common TE packet identities:
> - bandwidth-profile-type.
> - bandwidth-profile-type;
> - path-metric-loss;
> - path-metric-delay-variation.
>
> Added common TE packet groupings:
> - te-packet-path-bandwidth;
> - te-packet-link-bandwidth.";
> - te-packet-link-bandwidth.
>
> Updated module description.";
> reference
> "RFC XXXX: Updated Common YANG Data Types for Traffic
> Engineering";
> "RFC XXXX: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering";
> }
> // RFC Editor: replace XXXX with actual RFC number, update date
> // information and remove this note
61c80,126
61c89,187
< /**
---
> /*
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -89,13 +106,65 @@
> Marker with Efficient Handling of in-Profile Traffic";
> }
>
> // CHANGE NOTE: The identity path-metric-loss below has
> // been added in this module revision
> // RFC Editor: remove the note above and this note
> identity path-metric-loss {
> base te-types:path-metric-type;
> description
> "The path loss (as a packet percentage) metric type
> encodes a function of the unidirectional loss metrics of all
> links traversed by a P2P path.
>
> The basic unit is 0.000003%,
> where (2^24 - 2) or 50.331642% is the maximum value of the
> path loss percentage that can be expressed.
>
> Values that are larger than the maximum value SHOULD be
> encoded as the maximum value.";
> reference
> "RFC8233: Extensions to the Path Computation Element
> Communication Protocol (PCEP) to Compute Service-Aware Label
> Switched Paths (LSPs);
>
> RFC7471: OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions;
>
> RFC8570: IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions.";
> }
>
> // CHANGE NOTE: The identity path-metric-delay-variation below has
> // been added in this module revision
> // RFC Editor: remove the note above and this note
> identity path-metric-delay-variation {
> base te-types:path-metric-type;
> description
> "The path delay variation encodes the sum of the unidirectional
> delay variation metrics of all links traversed by a P2P path.
>
> The path delay variation metric unit is in microseconds, where
> (2^24 - 1) or 16,777,215 microseconds (16.777215 sec) is the
> maximum value of the path delay variation that can be
> expressed.
>
> Values that are larger than the maximum value SHOULD be
> encoded as the maximum value.";
> reference
> "RFC8233: Extensions to the Path Computation Element
> Communication Protocol (PCEP) to Compute Service-Aware Label
> Switched Paths (LSPs);
>
> RFC7471: OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions;
>
> RFC8570: IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions.";
> }
>
> /*
180a246,249
180a307,310
> /*
> * Groupings
> */
>
472a542,611
472a603,672
> }
> }
>
Expand Down
105 changes: 87 additions & 18 deletions drafts/te-types-update/diffs/te-pkt-types/model-diff.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,46 +1,63 @@
11c11,12
11c11
< "RFC 8776: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering";
---
> "RFCXXXX: Updated Common YANG Data Types for Traffic
> Engineering";
12a14,15
> "RFCXXXX: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering";
12a13,14
> // RFC Editor: replace XXXX with actual RFC number
> // and remove this note
22c25
22c24
< <mailto:tsaad@juniper.net>
---
> <mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>
41c44
37,39c39,49
< data type definitions specific to MPLS TE. The model fully
< conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture
< (NMDA).
---
> data type definitions specific to Packet Traffic Enginnering
> (TE).
>
> The model fully conforms to the Network Management Datastore
> Architecture (NMDA).
>
> The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
> NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED',
> 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as
> described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when,
> they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
41c51
< Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
---
> Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
46c49
> Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
46c56
< the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
---
> the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
51,52c54,71
51,52c61,80
< This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8776; see the
< RFC itself for full legal notices.";
---
> This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself
> for full legal notices.";
>
> revision 2023-07-10 {
> revision 2024-01-25 {
> description
> "Added common TE packet identities:
> - bandwidth-profile-type.
> - bandwidth-profile-type;
> - path-metric-loss;
> - path-metric-delay-variation.
>
> Added common TE packet groupings:
> - te-packet-path-bandwidth;
> - te-packet-link-bandwidth.";
> - te-packet-link-bandwidth.
>
> Updated module description.";
> reference
> "RFC XXXX: Updated Common YANG Data Types for Traffic
> Engineering";
> "RFC XXXX: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering";
> }
> // RFC Editor: replace XXXX with actual RFC number, update date
> // information and remove this note
61c80,126
61c89,187
< /**
---
> /*
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -89,13 +106,65 @@
> Marker with Efficient Handling of in-Profile Traffic";
> }
>
> // CHANGE NOTE: The identity path-metric-loss below has
> // been added in this module revision
> // RFC Editor: remove the note above and this note
> identity path-metric-loss {
> base te-types:path-metric-type;
> description
> "The path loss (as a packet percentage) metric type
> encodes a function of the unidirectional loss metrics of all
> links traversed by a P2P path.
>
> The basic unit is 0.000003%,
> where (2^24 - 2) or 50.331642% is the maximum value of the
> path loss percentage that can be expressed.
>
> Values that are larger than the maximum value SHOULD be
> encoded as the maximum value.";
> reference
> "RFC8233: Extensions to the Path Computation Element
> Communication Protocol (PCEP) to Compute Service-Aware Label
> Switched Paths (LSPs);
>
> RFC7471: OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions;
>
> RFC8570: IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions.";
> }
>
> // CHANGE NOTE: The identity path-metric-delay-variation below has
> // been added in this module revision
> // RFC Editor: remove the note above and this note
> identity path-metric-delay-variation {
> base te-types:path-metric-type;
> description
> "The path delay variation encodes the sum of the unidirectional
> delay variation metrics of all links traversed by a P2P path.
>
> The path delay variation metric unit is in microseconds, where
> (2^24 - 1) or 16,777,215 microseconds (16.777215 sec) is the
> maximum value of the path delay variation that can be
> expressed.
>
> Values that are larger than the maximum value SHOULD be
> encoded as the maximum value.";
> reference
> "RFC8233: Extensions to the Path Computation Element
> Communication Protocol (PCEP) to Compute Service-Aware Label
> Switched Paths (LSPs);
>
> RFC7471: OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions;
>
> RFC8570: IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions.";
> }
>
> /*
180a246,249
180a307,310
> /*
> * Groupings
> */
>
472a542,611
472a603,672
> }
> }
>
Expand Down
Loading