Skip to content

Conversation

@HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Mar 5, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • The API documentation now includes an additional option to expand configuration settings. This enhancement broadens available choices for users interacting with our API services and supports a wider range of interactions while preserving backwards compatibility. No existing functionality has been affected, ensuring a smooth transition and continued stability. Overall, these improvements result in a more robust API experience.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the OpenAPI specification in the openapi.yaml file by adding a new enumeration value http-bge-m3-multimodal to the ModelDocBlockKey schema. This addition expands the list of acceptable values without modifying any existing options or the overall structure of the schema.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/.../openapi.yaml Added a new enum value http-bge-m3-multimodal to the ModelDocBlockKey schema within the OpenAPI schema.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • github-actions

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a hop and a skip,
Coding changes like tasty carrot chips.
A new enum value sprouted with flair,
Making our OpenAPI even more rare.
With each little hop, I celebrate the tweak,
Bringing joy to our code, unique and sleek.
🥕🐰


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 11941e2 and ce3a3a1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.Models.ModelDocBlockKey.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (1)

4486-4490: New Enumeration Value Addition: "http-bge-m3-multimodal"

The new value has been added to the ModelDocBlockKey enum in a manner that is consistent with the existing naming conventions. Please verify that the API documentation and all client code that depends on this enumeration are updated to recognize and handle the new option appropriately.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge March 5, 2025 15:20
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit dd920c8 into main Mar 5, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Add http-bge-m3-multimodal enum to ModelDocBlockKey in openapi.yaml Mar 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants