Skip to content

Conversation

@HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Aug 1, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Expanded task parameter options for AI tasks, including support for transcript IDs, input text, model selection, output size limits, and temperature settings.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated required fields to ensure both prompt and model selection are mandatory.
  • Documentation

    • Improved example usage by removing deprecated fields and reflecting updated parameters.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The LemurTaskParams schema in the OpenAPI specification was expanded to directly include properties from the previously referenced LemurBaseParams. Several new fields were added, required fields were updated, and the example was revised to remove a deprecated property. The inheritance structure was flattened by merging base parameters inline.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
OpenAPI Schema Refactor
src/libs/AssemblyAI/openapi.yaml
Inlined properties from LemurBaseParams into LemurTaskParams, added transcript_ids, input_text, final_model, max_output_size, and temperature fields. Updated required fields to include final_model. Removed deprecated context from example.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Poem

A schema grows, its roots now deep,
No base to chase, no fields to keep.
Transcript IDs, a model's name,
Output size joins the game.
The context fades, the prompt stands tall—
Lemur’s ready to answer all!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202508010633

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@HavenDV HavenDV enabled auto-merge (squash) August 1, 2025 06:34
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Expand LemurTaskParams schema and flatten inheritance in OpenAPI spec Aug 1, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/libs/AssemblyAI/openapi.yaml (1)

5671-5675: Optional: add an explicit maximum for max_output_size

The description says “up to 4000”, but the schema does not enforce that upper bound.
Adding maximum: 4000 would let tooling catch invalid requests early.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eaafad3 and b315cbe.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • src/libs/AssemblyAI/Generated/AssemblyAI.JsonConverters.LemurTaskParams.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/AssemblyAI/Generated/AssemblyAI.Models.LemurTaskParams.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/AssemblyAI/Generated/AssemblyAI.Models.LemurTaskParamsVariant1.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/AssemblyAI/openapi.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/libs/AssemblyAI/openapi.yaml (2)
src/libs/AssemblyAI/Conversions/LemurTaskParams.cs (2)
  • struct (5-36)
  • FromPrompt (25-35)
src/libs/AssemblyAI/Conversions/LemurTaskParamsVariant1.cs (2)
  • FromPrompt (24-30)
  • LemurTaskParamsVariant1 (5-31)

Comment on lines +5647 to +5656
transcript_ids:
x-label: Transcript IDs
description: |
A list of completed transcripts with text. Up to a maximum of 100 hours of audio.
Use either transcript_ids or input_text as input into LeMUR.
type: array
items:
x-label: Transcript ID
type: string
format: uuid
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

DRY violation – properties copied instead of re-using LemurBaseParams

transcript_ids (and the other newly inlined fields) now exist in two places: LemurBaseParams and LemurTaskParams.
Keeping two authoritative copies will inevitably diverge and complicate future changes or docs generation.

Consider reverting to the previous compositional style:

allOf:
  - $ref: '#/components/schemas/LemurBaseParams'
  - type: object
    additionalProperties: false
    properties:
      prompt:
        ...

This keeps the contract identical while avoiding duplication.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/libs/AssemblyAI/openapi.yaml around lines 5647 to 5656, the properties
like transcript_ids are duplicated in both LemurBaseParams and LemurTaskParams,
violating DRY principles. To fix this, revert to using the allOf composition
style by referencing LemurBaseParams in LemurTaskParams with $ref, then add only
the additional properties specific to LemurTaskParams. This removes duplication
and keeps the schema consistent and maintainable.

Comment on lines +5664 to +5670
x-label: Final model
description: |
The model that is used for the final prompt after compression is performed.
default: "default"
oneOf:
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/LemurModel"
max_output_size:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Breaking change – final_model no longer accepts arbitrary model IDs

Previously (LemurBaseParams) the schema allowed either one of the enumerated LemurModel values or any free-form string via:

anyOf:
  - $ref: '#/components/schemas/LemurModel'
  - type: string

The new definition uses oneOf with only the enum, silently preventing custom model slugs that existing clients may rely on.
Unless this is intentional, switch back to anyOf (enum + string) to preserve backward compatibility.

- oneOf:
-   - $ref: '#/components/schemas/LemurModel'
+ anyOf:
+   - $ref: '#/components/schemas/LemurModel'
+   - type: string
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/libs/AssemblyAI/openapi.yaml around lines 5664 to 5670, the schema for
final_model uses oneOf with only the LemurModel enum, which disallows arbitrary
string model IDs and breaks backward compatibility. Change oneOf back to anyOf
and include both the LemurModel enum reference and a type string option to allow
custom model slugs as before.

@HavenDV HavenDV disabled auto-merge August 1, 2025 09:05
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit c531b33 into main Aug 1, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202508010633 branch August 1, 2025 09:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants