docs: reorder 2026 examples most-recent-first

[ellucas-creator]

What

Fixes the ordering in the 2026 examples section so it reads most-recent → oldest.

Before:

1. AgentCore Memory Agent — February 2026
2. A2A Real Estate — March 2026 ← out of order
3. Cost Optimization Agent — February 2026
   ...

After:

1. A2A Real Estate — March 2026 ← newest first ✅
2. AgentCore Memory Agent — February 2026
3. Cost Optimization Agent — February 2026
4. WebMCP + GCP — February 2026
5. OpenClaw Telemetry — February 2026
6. Google ADK A2A — January 2026

Also removes the NEW badge from AgentCore Memory Agent since the A2A Real Estate example is now the latest.

[claude]

Claude finished @ellucas-creator's task —— View job

---

Reviewing PR: docs: reorder 2026 examples most-recent-first

Todo List:

• Read and analyze the README.md file changes
• Review for code quality and best practices
• Check for potential issues or bugs
• Assess performance and security considerations
• Evaluate test coverage needs
• Provide comprehensive review feedback

Review Feedback

This PR makes a straightforward documentation improvement by reordering the 2026 examples section to be truly chronological (most recent first). Here's my analysis:

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

• Clean documentation structure: The reordering follows the stated principle "Most recent first" consistently
• Proper badge management: Correctly moves the NEW badge from AgentCore Memory Agent (February) to A2A Real Estate (March), maintaining badge accuracy
• Consistent formatting: Maintains the existing documentation format and style throughout

✅ Content Accuracy

• Logical ordering: The new sequence correctly orders by date:
  1. A2A Real Estate — March 2026 (newest)
  2. AgentCore Memory Agent — February 2026
  3. Cost Optimization Agent — February 2026
  4. WebMCP + GCP — February 2026
  5. OpenClaw Telemetry — February 2026
  6. Google ADK A2A — January 2026 (oldest)

✅ No Issues Found

• No bugs: This is a pure documentation reorder with no functional changes
• No security concerns: Documentation-only changes pose no security risk
• No performance impact: Static documentation changes don't affect runtime performance
• No test coverage needed: Documentation reordering doesn't require automated testing

📝 Minor Observation

The commit message and PR description are clear and well-documented, making the intent and scope obvious to reviewers.

Recommendation: ✅ APPROVE

This is a clean, well-executed documentation improvement that:

• Fixes the chronological ordering as intended
• Properly manages the NEW badge placement
• Maintains consistent formatting
• Has no negative side effects

The changes are exactly what's described in the PR and improve the user experience by presenting examples in true chronological order.

---