Skip to content

Conversation

@asurin
Copy link

@asurin asurin commented Feb 8, 2017

@chancedowns @wwjeff @weddingwire/code-review this will bring our repo in line with carrierwave 1.0.0, with our customizations (ability to pass specific params to chained imagick operations) mixed in

Once this is merged I'll bump the version in wwng's Gemfile.lock

bensie and others added 30 commits April 12, 2015 07:30
…refactor-specs

Move to Rspec 3 syntax and update rspec version
…fix-1631

[Fix 1631] Add proper documentation for fog/aws
* Add a line clarifying that 1.0.0 is still forthcoming
* Add a line clarifying how to bundle the gem so that the multiple uploader support referenced in the README is available.
Model.attached was nil, using model_attached fixes it.
…adme-for-multi

Clarify what's necessary for mount_uploaders
…hanges when assigning something blank to a mounter that was originally blank
…fix_1571

[Fix carrierwaveuploader#1571] - Do not write to ActiveModel::Dirty changes when assigning ...
Mime-types 2.6.1+ has a columnar store that only loads the data that is needed for a drastically reduced memory footprint. cc/ @jeremyevans @halostatue
mendab1e and others added 25 commits August 21, 2016 17:15
add spec: recreate_versions! should not change original file
…-download-by-url

Headers for download by url
I noticed an issue when deploying to my Heroku app. 

```
remote:        You have added to the Gemfile:
remote:        * google-api-client (< 0.9, >= 0.6.2)
remote:        
remote:        You have deleted from the Gemfile:
remote:        * google-api-client (< 0.9, >= 0.6.2)
remote:  !
remote:  !     Failed to install gems via Bundler.
```

Changing the order of these requirements fixed it for me.
…emfile

Add Rails 5.0 stable gemfile for testing.
…oogle-storage-public-url

Avoids a GET for Google Cloud storage public_urls
…rence_cache_dir_name_key_format

Fixed bug with the difference of key format between generate_cache_id and clean_cache!
…ngs-from-specs

Remove warnings from specs
@chancedowns
Copy link

I though @bernabas opened a PR to get the custom options into carrierwave at one point?

@asurin
Copy link
Author

asurin commented Feb 9, 2017

They never merged it :(. It even had people +1 it. No bloody idea why

@asurin
Copy link
Author

asurin commented Feb 9, 2017

Or maybe they did since Oct? When I was checking the. It hadn't been :(

@bernabas
Copy link

bernabas commented Feb 9, 2017

carrierwaveuploader#1754 hmm it is merged

@asurin
Copy link
Author

asurin commented Feb 9, 2017

Lol, weird. Maybe it just wasn't in the 0.9 branch we used then. Either way, let me test out running WW directly off of 1.0 then!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.