Open
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks for working on this! I'm on vacation right now with barely any internet connection, I hope to get a proper look later today. On a first glance, it looks like we're applying the raygui patch when building raylib (instead of raygui). |
tjammer
force-pushed
the
main
branch
3 times, most recently
from
4226d87 to
065c581
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates raygui version from 3.0 to 3.6. This introduces some breaking changes:
ControlStaterenamed toStatetext_box_multiwas removedIn addition, the new version makes
GuiScrollBarinternal - I've added a patch that undoes this so that applications built with 3.0 that use it can upgrade. (however, for some reason, neither this nor the other patches actually run at build on my machine, despite theapply_patch.mlexecutable working properly when I invoke it manually - this might be the subject of a separate issue)