feat!: support multiple ports in Proxyrack configuration #66
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
This pull request refactors the configuration for the
Proxyrackprovider to simplify and unify the proxy configuration, particularly around port handling. Instead of supporting both a singleportand an array ofportsdepending on the strategy, the code now consistently uses an array of ports. This change streamlines the provider's interface and removes redundant type definitions.Configuration unification and simplification:
TProxyrackProviderConfigStrategyChangeIpEveryRequestandTProxyrackProviderConfigStrategyManual) with a singleTProxyrackProviderConfigtype that always uses aportsarray. The main config interfaceTProxyrackConfignow supports both strategies in a unified way. [1] [2]Proxyrackprovider class to always select a port randomly from theportsarray, regardless of the strategy, removing the previous conditional logic.Code and documentation updates:
README.mdand tests) to use theportsarray instead of a singleportvalue. [1] [2]