Feature logging #293
Feature logging #293
Conversation
* Also new logging instantiation
| self.logger.info("*** OPTIMIZATION SEARCH TERMINATED BECAUSE THE LIMIT") | ||
| self.logger.info("ON THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TRIALS ") | ||
| self.logger.info(repetitions) | ||
| self.logger.info("HAS BEEN EXCEEDED.") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't this be a warning?
| import tables | ||
| except ImportError: | ||
| print( | ||
| spotpylogging.get_logger("hdf5").info( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should be a warning IMO
| print( | ||
| self.logger.debug( | ||
| "THE BEST POINT HAS IMPROVED IN LAST %d LOOPS BY LESS THAN THE USER-SPECIFIED THRESHOLD %f" | ||
| % (kstop, pcento) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
kstop, pcento should be arguments passed to debug for deferred evaluation by logging.
| ): | ||
| nloop += 1 | ||
| print("ComplexEvo loop #%d in progress..." % nloop) | ||
| self.logger.debug("ComplexEvo loop #%d in progress..." % nloop) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| self.logger.debug("ComplexEvo loop #%d in progress..." % nloop) | |
| self.logger.debug("ComplexEvo loop #%d in progress...", nloop) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this should work this way.
| icall += 1 | ||
| if self.status.stop: | ||
| print( | ||
| self.logger.debug( |
| self.logger.info( | ||
| "Starting the SA algotrithm with " + str(repetitions) + " repetitions..." | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| self.logger.info( | |
| "Starting the SA algotrithm with " + str(repetitions) + " repetitions..." | |
| ) | |
| self.logger.info("Starting the SA algotrithm with %d repetitions...", repetitions) |
| CL = np.vstack((CL, TL[L, :])) | ||
| IPOS = IPOS + 1 | ||
| print((IPOS, ITRY)) | ||
| self.logger.info((IPOS, ITRY)) |
MuellerSeb
left a comment
MuellerSeb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I really like this. I would suggest double checking whether to use info, warning or debug depending on the message.
Also I would double check passing variables to the logging message. It should be consistent and I would either prefer f-strings or the recommended deferred evaluation approach using the old fashioned formatting approach using %s, %d, %f and so on and passing the respective variable to the logging method.
|
Feel free to apply your changes. From my perspective they are reasonable, but I don't have time for this at the moment. |
3 participants
Hey I merged the feature-logging branch to the latest master changes, to be in sync with the spotpy master again. Unfortunately I forgot un-synced changes in my fork vs my local branches, therefore I pushed a new branch to my fork and created a new merge request. So this branch is now perfectly in sync with
thouska/spotpy:master. This replaces #244 as merge request (I closed it already) and the preceding discussion in issue #239.Note that writing to stdout can decrease overall performance, regardless of normal
printor aloggingprint. The advantage of using a logging mechanism is central configuration of message pattern and log levels.Hope this finally finds it's way into the codebase :)