Skip to content

Conversation

@evgeni
Copy link
Member

@evgeni evgeni commented Dec 3, 2025

No description provided.

@evgeni evgeni force-pushed the refactor-extdb-test branch 2 times, most recently from 132d32a to 48947e7 Compare December 3, 2025 09:13
@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Dec 3, 2025

@ehelms I didn't want to refactor it directly in #141, but I think this way it's nicer as it automatically benefits from any changes to our normal test workflow and the chances we forget something is smaller

Copy link
Member

@ehelms ehelms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wish the reporting was nicer to make it clear what was run:

[Test / tests (default, none, external) (pull_request)](https://github.com/theforeman/foremanctl/actions/runs/19888492813/job/57001229184?pr=348)
Test / tests (default, none, external) (pull_request)Successful in 34m
[Test / tests (default, none, internal) (pull_request)](https://github.com/theforeman/foremanctl/actions/runs/19888492813/job/57001229129?pr=348)
Test / tests (default, none, internal) (pull_request)Successful in 29m
[Test / tests (installer, none, internal) (pull_request)](https://github.com/theforeman/foremanctl/actions/runs/19888492813/job/57001229139?pr=348)
Test / tests (installer, none, internal) (pull_request)Successful in 31m

default, none, internal -- isn't the easy to understand at a glance that it's (certificates, security, database)

@evgeni evgeni force-pushed the refactor-extdb-test branch from 66819d2 to bdb5c64 Compare December 3, 2025 12:04
@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Dec 3, 2025

Like this?
image

@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Dec 3, 2025

I'll assume so :)

@evgeni evgeni merged commit 02a46c4 into master Dec 3, 2025
9 checks passed
@evgeni evgeni deleted the refactor-extdb-test branch December 3, 2025 12:43
@ehelms
Copy link
Member

ehelms commented Dec 3, 2025

Much better! Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants