Skip to content

Conversation

@ehelms
Copy link
Member

@ehelms ehelms commented Nov 25, 2025

In their current form, the checks only apply to the Foreman itself.

@ehelms
Copy link
Member Author

ehelms commented Nov 26, 2025

@stejskalleos, @evgeni what do you think?

Copy link
Contributor

@stejskalleos stejskalleos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stejskalleos stejskalleos merged commit 27daea9 into theforeman:master Nov 27, 2025
8 checks passed
@evgeni
Copy link
Member

evgeni commented Dec 2, 2025

@ehelms which checks did you not want to run on a proxy? check_system_requirements?

I am asking because #188 adds it back, effectively, so I want to follow up with a feature-based disablement.

@ehelms
Copy link
Member Author

ehelms commented Dec 2, 2025

@ehelms which checks did you not want to run on a proxy? check_system_requirements?

I am asking because #188 adds it back, effectively, so I want to follow up with a feature-based disablement.

The database check, and system requirements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants