Merged
Conversation
cretz
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2025
| ``` | ||
| option-sets: | ||
| - workflow-reference | ||
| - query-modifiers |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd be ok if we didn't even accept query reject condition, but meh
Contributor
I think that would make sense and be what most users would expect. At least, having one line per handler |
Member
Author
|
Looks like this now: |
Contributor
WDYT about the alignment -- would be nice to have the descriptions aligned, or perhaps just don't indent them at all if we're not going to enforce an alignment that works for all rows. |
dandavison
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was changed
workflow metadatacommand to run the built-in metadata query and show resultsNot-JSON looks like this:
Which is debatable since it's sorta half-JSON. I dunno if we want to recursively headerize this or not
Why?
Useful to run this from the CLI
Checklist
Closes
How was this tested:
Added tests
Any docs updates needed?