feat: add Cycleball EU Rest API for migration phase #33
Conversation
|
⏳ I'm reviewing this pull request for security vulnerabilities and code quality issues. I'll provide an update when I'm done |
WalkthroughThis PR introduces a new OpenAPI code generation task Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
✅ I finished the code review, and didn't find any security or code quality issues. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cycleball-api.yaml (2)
169-191: Remove commented-out code or implement the endpoint.The PDF print endpoint is commented out. Either remove it if not needed, or implement it if it's part of the API surface.
30-32: Consider adding maxItems constraints to arrays.Array responses without maximum item constraints could potentially cause performance issues or be exploited for DoS attacks. Consider adding reasonable maxItems constraints.
Example:
schema: type: array maxItems: 1000 items: $ref: '#/components/schemas/League'Also applies to: 76-78, 97-99, 117-120, 270-273, 305-307, 320-322
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/generated/rest.cycleball.model.generated.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.projen/tasks.json(2 hunks).projenrc.ts(1 hunks)cycleball-api.yaml(1 hunks)docs/assets/hierarchy.js(1 hunks)docs/assets/navigation.js(1 hunks)docs/assets/search.js(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
cycleball-api.yaml
[high] 1-612: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[high] 1-612: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[medium] 30-34: Ensure that arrays have a maximum number of items
(CKV_OPENAPI_21)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
docs/assets/navigation.js (1)
1-1: Documentation asset update looks correct.This appears to be an auto-generated documentation file with updated navigation data, consistent with the new API additions.
docs/assets/search.js (1)
1-1: Documentation asset update looks correct.Auto-generated search data update is consistent with the documentation regeneration.
docs/assets/hierarchy.js (1)
1-1: Documentation asset update looks correct.Auto-generated hierarchy data update is as expected.
package.json (1)
19-19: New codegen script properly integrated.The new
generate:api:restCBscript follows the existing naming conventions and is correctly positioned in the scripts section..projen/tasks.json (1)
148-156: Code generation task properly configured.The new
generate:api:restCBtask is correctly defined and integrated into the pre-compile sequence. The execution order (restCB → rest → graphql) ensures all API types are generated before compilation.Also applies to: 204-206
.projenrc.ts (1)
109-113: New codegen task properly integrated.The new
generate:api:restCBtask is correctly defined and will execute before the existing REST and GraphQL codegen tasks due to theprependSpawnbehavior (tasks execute in reverse order of prepending).
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
cycleball-api.yaml (1)
324-327:⚠️ [Duplicate] Apply security requirements to endpoints and document x-pin as a security scheme.The OpenID Connect security scheme is defined (lines 324–327), but no endpoints reference it. Additionally, the
x-pinheader used for authentication on lines 150–151, 198–199, and 232–233 is not formally documented as a security scheme. This leaves all endpoints effectively public and the API contract unclear regarding PIN-based authentication.Per the previous review feedback: Add a
PinAuthsecurity scheme and apply security requirements to protected endpoints.Apply this diff to formalize x-pin authentication and secure protected endpoints:
securitySchemes: OpenID: type: openIdConnect openIdConnectUrl: https://auth.cycleball.eu/.well-known/openid-configuration + PinAuth: + type: apiKey + in: header + name: x-pin + description: PIN-based authentication for matchday updatesThen add security blocks to protected operations. For example:
'/leagues/{oid}/matchdays/{dayId}/teams/{teamId}': put: tags: - leagues summary: update a single team of a matchday operationId: updateMatchdayTeam + security: + - PinAuth: [] parameters:Apply the same pattern to the other PUT operation (line 225–258) and the GET operation with x-pin (lines 144–168).
Also applies to: 18-322
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cycleball-api.yaml (1)
30-34: Add maxItems constraint to array responses.Array responses should define a maximum number of items to prevent unbounded responses and aid validation. The array at lines 30–34 (GET /leagues response) lacks a
maxItemsconstraint.Apply this diff:
description: successful operation content: application/json: schema: type: array + maxItems: 1000 items: $ref: '#/components/schemas/League'Consider applying similar constraints to other array responses throughout the specification (e.g., lines 76–78, 97–99, 118–120, 270–273, 304–307, 319–322).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cycleball-api.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
cycleball-api.yaml
[high] 1-612: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[high] 1-612: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[medium] 30-34: Ensure that arrays have a maximum number of items
(CKV_OPENAPI_21)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cycleball-api.yaml (1)
12-12: HTTPS server URL confirmed.The server URL correctly uses HTTPS. This addresses the security concern from the previous review.
| - name: x-pin | ||
| in: header |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add schema definitions to x-pin header parameters.
The x-pin header parameters lack schema definitions, making the parameter contract incomplete. This can cause issues during code generation and client validation.
Apply this diff to add schema to each x-pin parameter:
- name: x-pin
in: header
+ schema:
+ type: string
+ description: PIN for accessing matchday informationRepeat this fix for all three occurrences at line ranges 150–151, 198–199, and 232–233.
Also applies to: 198-199, 232-233
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In cycleball-api.yaml around lines 150-151, 198-199 and 232-233 the x-pin header
parameters lack schema definitions; update each x-pin parameter entry to include
a schema object (type: string, format: uuid if applicable or simple string)
under the header parameter so the contract is explicit for codegen and
validation; apply the same schema pattern to all three occurrences and ensure
indentation and YAML structure match surrounding parameters.
Summary by CodeRabbit