Skip to content

Conversation

@greynewell
Copy link
Contributor

@greynewell greynewell commented Jan 24, 2026

Summary

Automated update of @supermodeltools/sdk to version 0.6.2.

Changes

  • Updated @supermodeltools/sdk dependency to 0.6.2
  • Regenerated package-lock.json
  • Build verified successfully

Testing

  • Build succeeds (npm run build)
  • TypeScript compilation passes

This PR was automatically created by the deploy-production workflow when version 0.6.2 was released.

Please review and merge to complete the SDK update.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated dependency version to ensure stability and compatibility.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Updates:
- Upgraded @supermodeltools/sdk to 0.6.2

This update was automatically created by the release workflow.

Co-Authored-By: GitHub Actions <actions@github.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Walkthrough

This PR pins the @supermodeltools/sdk dependency to an exact version (0.6.2) instead of allowing flexible minor/patch updates. The caret (^) in the version specifier is removed, transitioning from a range-based constraint to a locked version.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency pinning
package.json
Changed @supermodeltools/sdk from ^0.6.0 to 0.6.2, removing the caret to lock the exact version.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

📌 A caret's removed with a gentle tap,
From ^ to pinned, no version gap,
0.6.2 locked in place so tight,
No surprises lurking left or right! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: updating the @supermodeltools/sdk dependency from ^0.6.0 to 0.6.2, which is the core focus of this PR.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@greynewell greynewell closed this Jan 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants