Skip to content

Conversation

@afn
Copy link
Contributor

@afn afn commented Dec 31, 2025

Rename GitHub workflow from pr-validation to commit-validation, and run on all pushes to all branches, rather than only running for open PRs.

Concurrency is configured to cancel earlier builds on branches except for main.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines 44 to +48
run: |
BASE=$(git merge-base ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.sha }} ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }})
BASE=$(git merge-base ${{ github.sha }} ${{ github.sha }})
pnpx commitlint \
--from "$BASE" \
--to ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
--to ${{ github.sha }}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Lint range collapses to a single commit on push

Because BASE is computed as git merge-base ${{ github.sha }} ${{ github.sha }}, the base always equals the current SHA, so --from and --to are identical. On a push that contains multiple commits (e.g., after a rebase or when pushing a series of local commits), this configuration only lints the tip commit and skips earlier commits, allowing invalid commit messages through. If the intent is to validate all commits introduced by the push, use the previous head (e.g., github.event.before) as the start of the range.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 That's legit. Marking this as do-not-merge for now.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

This compares github.sha with itself, so git merge-base will return the same commit.

@afn afn added the don't merge Don't merge yet label Jan 1, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@caio-pizzol caio-pizzol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea to shift to push-based validation (note: this will increase CI usage - which I think is OK in this case)

Comment on lines 44 to +48
run: |
BASE=$(git merge-base ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.sha }} ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }})
BASE=$(git merge-base ${{ github.sha }} ${{ github.sha }})
pnpx commitlint \
--from "$BASE" \
--to ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
--to ${{ github.sha }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

This compares github.sha with itself, so git merge-base will return the same commit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants