Skip to content

Conversation

@kaaviyavarrshini
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Correctness:

    • The solutions generally appear to solve the problems correctly, but there are some issues:
      • In Problem1_Bonus.py, there are two solutions in the same function which is incorrect syntax. The second solution should be in a separate function or commented out properly.
      • In Problem3_PatientCondition.py, the second solution has a syntax error (condn.str.startswith() should be just condn.startswith() since condn is a string, not a Series).
      • The second solution in Problem3_PatientCondition.py also doesn't properly handle cases where 'DIAB1' might appear in different forms (like lowercase).
  2. Time Complexity:

    • Problem1_Bonus.py:
      • First solution uses a loop: O(n) time complexity, which is good.
      • Second solution uses vectorized operations: O(n) but more efficient in practice due to pandas optimizations.
    • Problem2_FixNames.py:
      • Both solutions are O(n) and efficient.
    • Problem3_PatientCondition.py:
      • First solution is O(n) for the str operations.
      • Second solution is O(n*m) where m is the number of conditions per patient, which is less efficient.
  3. Space Complexity:

    • All solutions have reasonable space complexity (O(n) for the results), though some create intermediate DataFrames.
  4. Code Quality:

    • Strengths:
      • Provides multiple solutions for each problem.
      • Uses pandas effectively for most operations.
    • Areas for improvement:
      • Syntax errors in Problem3_PatientCondition.py.
      • Mixed solutions in one function in Problem1_Bonus.py.
      • Could use more comments explaining the logic.
      • Variable naming could be more descriptive (e.g., 'condns' vs 'conditions').
  5. Efficiency:

    • The vectorized pandas solutions are generally more efficient than the loop-based ones.
    • Could improve by:
      • Using consistent approaches (vectorized operations preferred in pandas).
      • Handling edge cases better (like empty DataFrames or null values).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants