Skip to content

Conversation

@kaaviyavarrshini
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student's solution demonstrates a good understanding of pandas operations for grouping and aggregating data. Here's a detailed evaluation:

  1. Correctness:
  • Problem1: The solution correctly groups products by sell date, counts unique products, and joins them in sorted order. Both pandas and non-pandas solutions are correct.
  • Problem2: Correctly calculates unique leads and partners per date and make_name.
  • Problem3: Correctly identifies actor-director pairs who collaborated at least 3 times.
  1. Time Complexity:
  • Problem1: O(n log n) due to sorting products for each date.
  • Problem2: O(n) for grouping operations.
  • Problem3: O(n) for grouping and counting.
  1. Space Complexity:
  • All solutions have O(n) space complexity as they store intermediate results.
  1. Code Quality:
  • Good use of pandas operations and method chaining.
  • Consistent formatting and style.
  • Could improve by adding docstrings explaining each function's purpose.
  • The commented-out non-pandas solution in Problem1 could be removed or moved to a separate file.
  1. Efficiency:
  • Problem1: The pandas solution is more efficient than the commented non-pandas version.
  • Problem3: Could potentially use count() instead of size() for clarity since we're counting occurrences.

Areas for improvement:

  • Add docstrings to explain function purposes and return types.
  • Consider removing commented code or moving it to a separate file.
  • The type ignore comment in Problem3 suggests potential type issues that could be properly addressed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants