Skip to content

Conversation

@sangeeths29
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

Let's evaluate each of the three solutions separately:

  1. Group Sold Products by the Date:
  • Correctness: The solution correctly groups by sell_date, calculates unique products, and joins them in sorted order. It handles the requirements well.
  • Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to the sorting operation (both in the join and final sort).
  • Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the grouped data.
  • Code Quality: Well-structured and readable. The use of lambda for joining sorted unique products is elegant.
  • Efficiency: Could potentially avoid the final sort if the groupby maintains order, but this is minor.
  1. Daily Leads and Partners:
  • Correctness: Correctly groups by date_id and make_name, calculating unique leads and partners as required.
  • Time Complexity: O(n) for grouping and aggregation, plus O(n log n) for the final sort.
  • Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the grouped data.
  • Code Quality: Clean and straightforward. Good use of aggregation functions.
  • Efficiency: Similar to first solution, the sort might not be necessary if order is preserved.
  1. Actors and Directors who Cooperated At Least Three Times:
  • Correctness: Correctly identifies pairs with at least 3 cooperations. The filtering is done properly.
  • Time Complexity: O(n) for grouping and counting.
  • Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the counts.
  • Code Quality: Simple and effective. The chained operations are clear.
  • Efficiency: The solution is already quite efficient for this problem.

General strengths:

  • Consistent style across solutions
  • Proper use of pandas operations
  • Good function naming and parameter handling
  • Appropriate use of aggregation functions

Areas for improvement:

  • The sorting operations in the first two solutions might not be strictly necessary if the problem doesn't require sorted output
  • Could add docstrings to explain function purposes
  • Could consider using more descriptive variable names in some cases (like 'groups' could be more specific)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants