Skip to content

Conversation

@Mukul585
Copy link

@Mukul585 Mukul585 commented Jan 8, 2026

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

Strengths:

  • The solution demonstrates a deep understanding of the problem and employs an efficient algorithm.
  • The code is clean, well-commented, and easy to follow.
  • The use of in-place modification to mark seen numbers is a clever optimization.

Areas for Improvement:

  • The solution could benefit from a brief comment explaining the overall approach at the beginning of the method.
  • The variable names could be slightly more descriptive (e.g., li could be result or missingNumbers for clarity).
  • The method could include a check for edge cases, such as an empty input array, although the current implementation handles it gracefully.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  • The student's solution is excellent in terms of both correctness and efficiency. The approach of marking indices by negating values is clever and efficient.
  • The code is clean and well-commented, making it easy to understand.
  • The student has demonstrated a good understanding of the problem and has implemented an optimal solution.
  • The other files (MinMaxFinder.java and Problem3.java) are not relevant to the problem being evaluated, but they show the student's ability to handle different types of problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants