no polymer

[straker]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 97.994% when pulling 467e1fa on noPolymer into ae6ad3f on master.

[straker]

@phun-ky alright, so I'm back at this again during the holiday break and wondering what the performance of your styleguide is if I completely remove Polymer. Almost all major browsers support Web Components and Shadow DOM now, with Edge being the last one and it will get it as soon as it upgrades to the Chromium engine. So I'm able to just use native Shadow DOM to make this work.

[phun-ky]

Actually, I removed polymer myself, and just using scoped CSS. Works like a charm for my usage. Will see if I can test that branch nevertheless. Happy new year!  null

[straker]

Oh nice, I didn't know browsers were still supporting that. In that case can I close #71? It was proving difficult trying to get it to work anyway.

[phun-ky]

I'm not using CSS scope, I just prefix the style guide styles with:  .sg (short for styleguide) and the design system have their own prefix, so styles won't cascade ;)  null