Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Nov 20, 2025

Identified and fixed several inefficient code patterns causing unnecessary CPU cycles and memory allocations.

Changes

Server-side stderr processing (server/src/index.ts)

  • Cache chunk.toString() result instead of calling 3× per chunk
  • Reuse trimmed string for case conversion instead of converting original chunk
// Before: 3 toString() calls per chunk
if (chunk.toString().includes("MODULE_NOT_FOUND")) { ... }
let message = chunk.toString().trim();
let ucMsg = chunk.toString().toUpperCase();

// After: 1 toString() call
const chunkStr = chunk.toString();
if (chunkStr.includes("MODULE_NOT_FOUND")) { ... }
let message = chunkStr.trim();
const ucMsg = message.toUpperCase();

Client-side JSON parsing (client/src/components/JsonView.tsx)

  • Eliminate duplicate tryParseJson() invocation in useMemo by caching parse result

Schema normalization (client/src/utils/schemaUtils.ts)

  • Replace multiple .some() iterations with single-pass type detection
  • Reduces O(n×m) to O(n) where n=array length, m=type checks
  • Consolidates 96 lines to 33 lines

Array operations (client/src/utils/jsonUtils.ts)

  • Extend arrays in-place instead of creating intermediate copies

Header processing (server/src/index.ts)

  • Hoist header lookup outside conditional to avoid redundant access
Original prompt

Identify and suggest improvements to slow or inefficient code


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI self-assigned this Nov 20, 2025
Copilot AI and others added 2 commits November 20, 2025 18:16
Co-authored-by: stopazus <228461123+stopazus@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: stopazus <228461123+stopazus@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Identify and suggest improvements for slow code Optimize redundant string operations and array iterations Nov 20, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from stopazus November 20, 2025 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants