Add Trädportalen as a source#1
Open
perliedman wants to merge 1 commit intostevage:masterfrom
perliedman:tradportalen
Open
Add Trädportalen as a source#1perliedman wants to merge 1 commit intostevage:masterfrom perliedman:tradportalen
perliedman wants to merge 1 commit intostevage:masterfrom
perliedman:tradportalen
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks! 4 hours, eep. I'm a bit scared to try! How many trees is it again? |
Contributor
Author
|
When I looked in QGIS it was slightly more than half a million trees IIRC, so does not sound too bad... |
Owner
|
Seems to process fine for me - 548,661 trees. Thank you! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have uploaded all the observations from Trädportalen here: https://tradportalen.s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/tradportalen.zip, it's one zipped file of GeoJSON (as you hinted, it does compress really well).
I have done my best to add it as a source here, but I more or less guessed from looking at some of the other sources, so I might have misunderstood some parts.
I tried to test this with
npm run get, but it spiked my CPU at 100% for four full hours of CPU time now - not sure if that is normal or if I broke something.