Skip to content

Conversation

@joticajulian
Copy link

These lines explain the payout for each curator. I added a latex equation because the computation is complex to understand with only words.
The details of this equation are explained here.

These lines explain the payout for each curator. I added a latex equation because the computation is complex to understand with only words.
The details of this equation are explained [here](https://steemit.com/steemit/@jga/author-and-curator-rewards-in-hf19).
@plink01001
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR! This is a great addition. I will need to find someone to review who is familiar with the curation formula though. This may take some time.


Users also have the option to be paid in 100% SP, as well as decline payout on posts. When a user declines payout on a post, the money that would have been paid to them remains in the rewards pool, to be distributed to other users.

#### Curators distribution
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We had an expert take a look at this, and it sounds like it's mostly correct, but leaves an incomplete picture. Since the total payout varies over time, PT would be at a different state from P1 and P0. It would be more accurate to consider these three variables in terms of Rshares instead of payouts. Can you please review and provide an update?

@joticajulian
Copy link
Author

Ok, it is now in terms of shares!
Additionally, I added that negative-votes and changes in voting do not receive curation rewards.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants