Initial additions of orcid and ror #11
Conversation
| | sci:citation | string | The recommended human-readable reference (citation) to be used by publications citing the data. No specific citation style is suggested, but the citation should contain all information required to find the publication distinctively. | | ||
| | sci:publications | [[Publication Object](#publication-object)] | List of relevant publications referencing and describing the data. | | ||
| | sci:orcids | \[string] | An array of Open Researcher Contribution IDs ([ORCID](https://orcid.org)) associated with this product. For all ORCIDs a link SHOULD be added to the links section. | | ||
| | sci:ror s | \[string] | An array of Research Organization Record ([ROR](https://ror.org)) entity name or unique identifier. For all ROR(s) names and identifiers a link SHOULD be added to the links section. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| | sci:ror s | \[string] | An array of Research Organization Record ([ROR](https://ror.org)) entity name or unique identifier. For all ROR(s) names and identifiers a link SHOULD be added to the links section. | | |
| | sci:rors | \[string] | An array of Research Organization Record ([ROR](https://ror.org)) entity name or unique identifier. For all ROR(s) names and identifiers a link SHOULD be added to the links section. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it make sense to give some best practices here?
For example, sci:orcid makes sense in conjunction with the contacts extension and sci:ror seems to make most sense in the providers list, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes. I was not aware of the contacts extension. I'll have to take a look at it. Should we have an example in the sci repo showing the usage with the contacts extension or is the intention that each extension is nominally stand alone?
|
|
||
| | Type | Description | | ||
| | ------- | ----------- | | ||
| | author | An ORCID link SHOULD be added to the links section for the author(s) referenced by the `sci:orcids` property with the `rel` type `author`. (see [rel type author](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/links.html#link-type-author)) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe separate ror and orcid relation types? We can probably just name the relation types ror and orcid...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 I wasn't sure if relation types were managed by a standards organization. I'll use ror and orcid.
| "href": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2232-428X" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "rel": "related", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The docs say author, here it's related?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I wasn't sure if we were limited to a defined set of rel types. I'll update.
|
|
||
| ### Added | ||
|
|
||
| - sci:rors and sci:orcids to the item properties and collection fields. Fixes [#10](https://github.com/stac-extensions/scientific/issues/10) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - sci:rors and sci:orcids to the item properties and collection fields. Fixes [#10](https://github.com/stac-extensions/scientific/issues/10) | |
| - `sci:rors` and `sci:orcids` to the item properties and collection fields. Fixes [#10](https://github.com/stac-extensions/scientific/issues/10) | |
| - new relation type `author` | |
Or whatever you call the relation type based on the comments below.
|
The tests should automatically succeed, if your commits are valid. The validator will map to the local files. The CI currently fails due to malformed files (e.g. indentation). |
2 participants
Adds ORCID and RoR identifiers.
A few items for discussion: