Closed
Conversation
RasmusSkytte
force-pushed
the
feature/RJDBC-support
branch
3 times, most recently
from
06d5d34 to
ec7269b
Compare
Contributor
LasseEngboChr
left a comment
LasseEngboChr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a test using RJDBC instead of odbc
Contributor
Author
Contributor
Author
|
Hmm. I have been trying to implement Oracle support over in #195 but this has been much harder than expected. There seems to be some work going on at |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Intent
This PR adds
RJDBCto suggests to support connection to Oracle DatabasesFixes #181
Approach
N/A
Known issues
N/A
Checklist
NEWS.md